A very simple Question :

(The United states Or The Islamic republic of Iran)

Who do you think is very dangerours ? and why ?!

If you are going to answer here are the rules:

1) you must chose, one.
2) you must Give a reason for your choice (why!?) supported by logic.
3) Use history ( wars, culture, peace, how many killed people,...) to support your choice.

Take care.

A very simple Question :

(The United states Or The Islamic republic of Iran)

Who do you think is very dangerours ? and why ?!

If you are going to answer here are the rules:

1) you must chose, one.
2) you must Give a reason for your choice (why!?) supported by logic.
3) Use history ( wars, culture, peace, how many killed people,...) to support your choice.

Take care.

Note: To add an image or link in your message,<br/> use <img src="http://www.hi5.com/example.jpg"> or <a href="http://www.hi5.com/example.html">Text </a>

 Quote Original

 Watch this Topic

  

USA

USA

Note: To add an image or link in your message,<br/> use <img src="http://www.hi5.com/example.jpg"> or <a href="http://www.hi5.com/example.html">Text </a>

 Quote Original

 Watch this Topic

  

USA's unilateralism

USA's unilateralism

Note: To add an image or link in your message,<br/> use <img src="http://www.hi5.com/example.jpg"> or <a href="http://www.hi5.com/example.html">Text </a>

 Quote Original

 Watch this Topic

  

I agree that the american unilateralism is obvious but to deal with it there are three options, two of them are diametrically opposed and the third is in the middle.
the first option is the total obeyance like the example of tony blair and the british position concerning the war on terror and specially that on Iraq.
the second option can be characterised as romantic:the discourse reflects a rejection and a demonisation of the united states, this option is developed by leaders who represent the "golden"age of anti americanism like hugo chavez or ahmadi nejad.
the last option which represents in my opinion the most pragmatic position is the french attitude expressed by both former president chirac and former foreign affairs minister de villepin and it consists of the following: recognizing the usa's right but without denying one's freedom of action.clearly it is to reply to president bush,when he says: "you are with us or against us", there is always a way to stand before two roads: IT IS NEUTRALITY.

I agree that the american unilateralism is obvious but to deal with it there are three options, two of them are diametrically opposed and the third is in the middle.
the first option is the total obeyance like the example of tony blair and the british position concerning the war on terror and specially that on Iraq.
the second option can be characterised as romantic:the discourse reflects a rejection and a demonisation of the united states, this option is developed by leaders who represent the "golden"age of anti americanism like hugo chavez or ahmadi nejad.
the last option which represents in my opinion the most pragmatic position is the french attitude expressed by both former president chirac and former foreign affairs minister de villepin and it consists of the following: recognizing the usa's right but without denying one's freedom of action.clearly it is to reply to president bush,when he says: "you are with us or against us", there is always a way to stand before two roads: IT IS NEUTRALITY.

Note: To add an image or link in your message,<br/> use <img src="http://www.hi5.com/example.jpg"> or <a href="http://www.hi5.com/example.html">Text </a>

 Quote Original

 Watch this Topic

  

Lee Bo , you are not answering by the rules.

take care.

Lee Bo , you are not answering by the rules.

take care.

Note: To add an image or link in your message,<br/> use <img src="http://www.hi5.com/example.jpg"> or <a href="http://www.hi5.com/example.html">Text </a>

 Quote Original

 Watch this Topic

  

Thanks , bilel fathi for your replay.

Thanks , bilel fathi for your replay.

Note: To add an image or link in your message,<br/> use <img src="http://www.hi5.com/example.jpg"> or <a href="http://www.hi5.com/example.html">Text </a>

 Quote Original

 Watch this Topic

  

Mr.Thaksin in Thailand

Mr.Thaksin in Thailand

Note: To add an image or link in your message,<br/> use <img src="http://www.hi5.com/example.jpg"> or <a href="http://www.hi5.com/example.html">Text </a>

 Quote Original

 Watch this Topic

  

haha , such a funny bunny

haha , such a funny bunny

Note: To add an image or link in your message,<br/> use <img src="http://www.hi5.com/example.jpg"> or <a href="http://www.hi5.com/example.html">Text </a>

 Quote Original

 Watch this Topic

  

USA

Reason= They are the Nation who has cuased all the major wars in the world, and also they are the Nation that used Nuclear wepons to Bomb Japan,


But If Obama becomes the Next president of the USA then I think he would make a USA a better place for Americans and to the world Population!

USA

Reason= They are the Nation who has cuased all the major wars in the world, and also they are the Nation that used Nuclear wepons to Bomb Japan,


But If Obama becomes the Next president of the USA then I think he would make a USA a better place for Americans and to the world Population!

Note: To add an image or link in your message,<br/> use <img src="http://www.hi5.com/example.jpg"> or <a href="http://www.hi5.com/example.html">Text </a>

 Quote Original

 Watch this Topic

  

of course usa. because in history the ISLAMIC republıc of ıran make war only ıran ıraq war you know again usa and soviets cold war stıff only but usa had spanish war world wars and this democracy wars-for oil . then brother who is dangerours

of course usa. because in history the ISLAMIC republıc of ıran make war only ıran ıraq war you know again usa and soviets cold war stıff only but usa had spanish war world wars and this democracy wars-for oil . then brother who is dangerours

Note: To add an image or link in your message,<br/> use <img src="http://www.hi5.com/example.jpg"> or <a href="http://www.hi5.com/example.html">Text </a>

 Quote Original

 Watch this Topic